Advertising Got Better

Pentagram Partner and Creativity 50 Honoree Paula Scher: A Graphic Designer's Post-9/11 Observation

Published: Feb 20, 2008

Since 9/11, I've secretly measured the socioeconomic well-being of New York City by the advertising content and graphic design of the billboards on the Long Island Expressway between the Midtown Tunnel and the Greenpoint Avenue exit in Queens. I like seeing lots of billboards, and I want them to be filled with terrific ads.

I started doing this about two weeks after 9/11, when on the way out to Kennedy Airport I discovered that the billboards went away. I mean, the billboards were physically there, but the messages were gone. The billboards had been painted all white except for one that had a large stock image of a huge American flag blowing in the wind superimposed with "God Bless America" in some indiscernible serif font.

I don't want to diminish all the tragedy and horror of 9/11, but the blank billboards really sent the chilling message home to me that we were at war. The missing billboards meant that the current state of affairs was so unbelievably bleak that all consumerism, frivolity and excess, in any form, even the most necessary trade, were on hold until things became less dire.

The graphic design community has actually been advocating that for a long time: "Make advertising go away." The graphic design community doesn't like advertising; it thinks advertising's immoral. (It doesn't count book covers, CD covers, annual reports, magazine covers, corporate brochures, real estate brochures and promotions for cultural institutions as advertising). The American graphic design community likes to promote the First Things First 2000 petition that advocates that graphic designers forswear all advertising (except for non-profit organizations doing good works). I wish the entire American graphic design community could have driven to Kennedy that day after 9/11 and viewed that ghost town of blank billboards.

Then one by one, the billboards came back. It took at least eight months. First were the rather cheesy ones, local service ads with phone numbers on them, ads for electric companies and other utilities like cable TV, then hospitals. Later there were a few bank ads, and a few liquor ads. The ads got lusher; they had better photography. Then came the movie and theater ads, the really good consumer electronics ads and finally, fashion. I never knew how much I would miss them all.

But something else has happened post-9/11. I think advertising came back with a vengeance and got better. On the whole (with the exception of movie and theater advertising) ads are better designed than anytime I can remember since the sixties. The concepts are smarter, the layouts are more sophisticated, type choices are more appropriate, and art direction is more nuanced. Some agencies like Ogilvy and Wolff Olins have branding arms that give large graphic design firms a serious run for their money. And they've also competed with design firms by donating their branding services to local initiatives and cultural institutions (the Wolff Olins branding of the New Museum, etc.). They are doing it phenomenally well.

The best web site I've seen since 9/11 belonged to Leo Burnett. The best jokey web videos that get forwarded to me have all been hatched at advertising agencies like Crispin Porter + Bogusky. If you're a young interactive designer, advertising agencies have the strongest, most creative and innovative departments. Agencies like Goodby, Silverstein & Partners that always demonstrated a high level of craft in their advertising in the nineties are even better now. In the Art Director's Club annuals of the past five to seven years, the advertising section is much more vibrant and varied than the graphic design section. Even the billboards along the Long Island Expressway have gotten better. Perry Ellis, a clothing company whose logo I designed a while back had an ad campaign a year ago that relied on terrific illustration. There it was on the L.I.E.! A fashion company with a well-done illustrative billboard! Imagine that.

I don't exactly know why this has occurred. I know that graphic design students, for the first time in decades, are considering advertising agency jobs as viable. The talented design staffs of some web and interactive companies from the nineties that imploded, like MarchFirst, may have relocated at the better agencies. Also, some agencies have hired terrific graphic designers as creative directors, where formerly the creative directors would have come from the copy side of agency. My former design staffs, after leaving my employ, have traditionally gone into magazine design, book design, or worked at in-house art departments for entertainment media companies. In the past five years, several that have left have either freelanced for or taken jobs at advertising agencies. I can't remember that happening in over thirty years.

I'm not sure that the graphic design community as a whole is paying any attention to this. I don't see very many speakers from the advertising community invited to speak at design conferences (except for the very few who lead branding groups at agencies and in some circles they are still considered the enemy). I don't read about it on design blogs, and I'm not seeing books published about it. I'm not seeing advertising, in any form, turn up in any design museum exhibitions, not at the Modern, not at the Cooper-Hewitt. The Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum has an annual designer award category for Communication Design and I've never seen an advertising person nominated since the award's inception.

How can the design community be so insular? Something has definitely changed here, and the design community is missing it. Too bad. Whatever the reason for the change, it's been fun, and a little unnerving, to watch.

3 Comments: By TTigerX2 February 20th, 2008 09:16:47 pm

I can relate to Paula's reaction -- not from a New York perspective -- but from watching how design has receded into a non-accessible space. I had covered advertising as a journalist and was more or less always looking at what the design companies were doing because it seemed the trajectory was more thrilling to write about. Lately, design has become more about style than function and achieving neither. I blame the client, who should be demanding more from packagers especially. Designers once went boldly into the fray telling consumers they had choices. Otherwise, we will have to settle on the banality of golf clothing because no one has a better idea, especially the shoes. Now it seems designers have given up the chase and we are falling victim to accepting neutrality and the t-shirt is their emblem. It's the ad guys who put the message on the shirt.

By toreclaesson February 24th, 2008 10:32:17 am

I'm Swedish. I have live and worked in New York for quite a few years now.
While its true that graphic design is an important part of successful advertising design at ad agencies it's generally a world apart from the more specialized graphic design companies Paula is referring to.
Oh, what's that got to do with being Swedish. Well, in my sparsely populated home country graphic design and advertising design were much more linked.
As an art director in advertising I designed logos, annual reports, packaging, signage and most everything, even products, besides ads. This was, and is, still common in smaller markets.
At Ogilvy in NY (where I worked for some 5 years) it can be noted that the design group BIG often was involved in developing graphic elements and languages for campaigns. This is probably rare, at least as far as bigger US ad agencies go.
Noteworthy however, is that advertising agencies such as Goodby, Silverstein and Partners, Weiden & Kennedy. Kirshenbaum & Bond, to name a few creatively focused ones, have always paid attention to graphic design as an integral part of successful communication.
The line drawn between advertising and design is totally artificial and unnecessary.
As Paula seems to point out; Doing an ad for a book is dirty, designing the cover the for the same book is worthy.
It puzzles me. I think it has also, to a not unimportant degree, undermined the importance of good design as a commercial tool whether in advertising or graphic design for commercial use.
Graphic design has degraded itself by pretending to be a higher art. And by that alienated the board rooms of the big companies. Which to some degree have put design as a whole in the back-room.
If more people took design, on every level, as seriously as Apple, for example, I'm sure we'd have a better choice of better products around. Everything from cars to frying pans.

By jonmc March 13th, 2008 12:56:48 am

This is a really interesting article and to me there is a lot of truth here but who ever thought of Wolff Olins as an ad agency? Maybe they have branched out recently but they are really one of the original brand and corporate identity firms. To liken them to Ogilvy & Mather is just strange...

Email a friend