J.C. Penney decries Lion-winning Saatchi ad

Client unhappy about racy Bronze-adorned spot it says it never approved.

By: Ann-christine Diaz, Published: Jun 24, 2008
Although J.C. Penney has received a lot of well-deserved attention for the creative makeover it's gotten from Saatchi & Saatchi, New York, the retailer is up in arms over a fake spot that earned a Bronze Lion at this year's Cannes International Advertising Festival. The "Speed Dressing" ad, directed by former Saatchi creative Mike Long out of Epoch Films, features a teenage boy and girl respectively running through drills, quickly stripping and re-dressing themselves, in preparation for an upcoming rendezvous in the girl's basement while her mother is at home. The ad has been circulating on Youtube since Monday. J.C. Penney never signed off on the spot and disapproves of its apparent promotion of teen sex.

"J.C. Penney was deeply disappointed to learn that our name and logo were used in the creation and distribution of a commercial that was submitted to the 2008 International Advertising Festival at Cannes," the company said in a statement to Creativity. "No one at J.C. Penney was aware of the ad or participated in the creation of it in any way. The commercial was never broadcast, but rather was created by a former employee at J.C. Penney's advertising agency, Saatchi & Saatchi, solely as an award submission without J.C. Penney's knowledge or prior approval. J.C. Penney does not approve or condone its content, and we have asked Saatchi & Saatchi to remove the ad from online circulation and to apologize to our customers and our associates for misrepresenting our company in this manner."

And Saatchi has done just that, responding almost sentence by sentence with its own statement: "Saatchi & Saatchi has a long history of producing principled and respectful advertising for J.C. Penney and its entire client roster," said the agency, adding that the spot "was created by a third party vendor without J.C. Penney's knowledge or consent.It was produced and released to the public without any knowledge or prior approval from J.C. Penney. Saatchi & Saatchi did not enter the spot and deeply regrets the message this ad presents. Saatchi & Saatchi apologizes to J.C. Penney, its associates and its customers. The commercial is being removed from public circulation."

According to the Cannes International Advertising Festival site, the commercial was submitted by production company Epoch Films. Creativity contacted Epoch but was referred back to the agency.

The incident brings into glaring view the issue of scam or "ghost" ads at Cannes and advertising awards shows — typically, highly creative work that is of dubious relevance because it ran only once in a small or test market in order to meet awards show qualifications, or as it appears in this case, because it was never approved by the client. Other festival winners- —this year and in years past - —have been suspected scams.

Cannes festival submission forms do ask entrants to provide a date that entries first appeared. The forms also ask entrants to supply the name of a client. The form states: "If your entry is shortlisted, the jury may want to contact your client to verify the results." The festival's entry guidelines also state: "Entries cannot be made without the prior permission of the advertiser/owner of the rights of the advertisement;" and "All entries must have been made within the context of a normal paying contract with a client, except in the charities and public services categories... the Festival reserves the right to request a full media schedule from each entrant company to verify the authenticity of the ad(s) in the event that entry is shortlisted or a winner." It's not yet known if the Film jury attempted to contact any clients to verify work, or if the festival requested a media schedule from anybody. Cannes organizers and jurors contacted by Creativity did not respond to inquiries by posting time.
14 Comments: By wongdoody June 24th, 2008 04:58:00 pm

Come on, Saatchi knew about it. How could they not?

Warning to Saatchi: you've been officially outed and your (fake) days are numbered.

By theandy June 24th, 2008 06:00:12 pm

Whoa. JC Penney, I think the only thing you should be pissed about is that your logo was attached to something this self-indulgent, that over-produced, that cliched. The implied teen sex is the least of your worries. Really? _This_ gets into Cannes? _This_ makes the news? Dinosaurs.

By silkyjohnson June 24th, 2008 06:15:36 pm

Entries aren't vetted. The guidelines are written so that if someone notices a "ghost spot" after it wins an award, the award can be withdrawn, but someone must point it out to the governing body. This is not the first spot of its kind to slip through the stringent guidelines of the award show circuit. The governing body is not in the habit of giving back any of the money they collect, they'll watch anything you put in front of them as long as you pay them to do so. Now for the good part - what's the proper punishment for Epoch & Mike Long? Are they not allowed to enter awards shows for a full year or two? Perhaps they get to enter as much work as they can afford to next year, but it's never shown to the judges, much like this spot was never shown to JC Penney or the viewing audience?

By Richard Rodriguez June 24th, 2008 06:16:27 pm

Somebody was asleep at the wheel to let this one in. "lions" like other awards, are from and for agencies egos. In this case an international slap on the back for a ghost. Reality.......Retailer J. C. Penney Co. Inc. on Thursday reported a steeper drop in May sales than a year ago and said it expects continued declines in June.

By fuval June 24th, 2008 06:23:24 pm

Truth is that this is great work.

If brands did work like this they would be better off.
It's interesting, bold, makes you think.
But most brands would rather do uninteresting, all-the-same stuff that's safe, uninspiring and unrememberable.
And that's what 99.9% of them do - especially in the USA.

JCP should embrace this rouge creativity.
It's better than anything they have ever done.
You could argue it's off strategy...but that's only because on strategy work means boring, cookie cutter work.

This ad connects. It's born of real teenage insight - they don't want to get caught making out. It's got a good feel and it's simple.

The best single execution that JC has ever done IMO.

Interestingly, it's the bold idea that everyone wants on brief-day.

It's too bad that in today's hyper safe world of marketing, a bold, cut-through, makes-you-think idea is the surest thing to die and aweful death.

Thank you JCP for reminding us all what BS this industry can be.

By humphreyr June 24th, 2008 07:51:57 pm

This ad is awesome...beautifully done, creative, and thought-provoking. The creators of this ad should be commended and JC Penney should thank them for the "free" publicity they received. Hey, maybe that was the idea, enter a fake ghost spot, create a controversy, and get the publicity. Brilliant!!!

By tempovision June 25th, 2008 12:51:41 am

Wait - this is the ad? You're kidding. It won a Lion? I'm scratching my head and re-reading the article and the rah rah comment. Where did you say the genius was?

By ProudPapa June 25th, 2008 01:47:26 am

I think everyone appreciates great work, but we all know how much harder it is to play by the rules and present, sell and produce for a paying client. Now that's an achievement. When these spec spots roll out along with real work, it completely fucks the bell curve... not to mention hogs a lion.

By feihong June 25th, 2008 02:10:45 am

So will the bronze award go to the runner up? Like the Miss USA pageant if the winner is disqualified? Come on Cannes... do something good for a change.

By the way, the idea is fine. I wouldn't say it should've been a bronze, but it's a nice idea. Probably more suitable for Abercrombie, but definitely not JCPenny. Come on, have you shopped there????? They're about as a sexy as grandma in the kitchen baking wearing a g-string.

By MWalker June 25th, 2008 07:27:42 am

Like everyone doesn't now this has been and will keep happening.
Many careers are made on just this kind of loophole and agencies
are completely aware of and secretly support it, until it bites them.
Dont make Mike Long the scapegoat, it's just as ridiculous as
pretending you're surprised.

By wordmotor June 25th, 2008 09:47:12 am

maybe both parties planned the whole thing? It's been done before. or are we to assume people at J.C. and Saatchi just aren't that savvy? christ, we may never know.

By AOA June 25th, 2008 11:52:35 am

I know the fake work sometimes beats out the real work. But my sympathy runs in both directions. Not too long ago, an exec. producer told me that a director--a really good one--wouldn't shoot in the states anymore because the clients run all the advertising. Maybe it's that way everywhere. I dunno. But it seems to me the clients do run the advertising. Fear and prudishness outweighs trust and a desire to experiment. Immensely. And no amount of passion and persuasion seems to move them anymore. At best they find it quaint. I can't completely defend Saatchi. But i'd wager the team behind the spot suffered from the simple desire to produce something interesting. And provocative. And cool. It's hard to fault that. At least it is for me.

By Makak June 26th, 2008 11:42:27 pm

THIS IS A BAD AD. It does not work with the sign-off. It seems to be creative for the sake of being creative for award submission. Saatchi should know that Crispin does such viral ads for real and which is paid for by the client

And an ad should do more than just attract people to see it and leave it as that.

After all, when you ask them to see it, the next question is what do you want me to do after seeing it?

Poorly thought out. Draggy storyline. Such badly thoughout scam work should not be encouraged.

And blaming the production company? BS!

No production company would have submitted it without checking with the ad agency, unless the production company no longer wants to work with Saatchi.

Truth is Saatchi approved this ad for submission.

By 2020publicidad July 10th, 2008 04:20:03 pm

Yeah, yeah, yeah... If you do steroids you can't play ball or get in the French Open... what should be done is just ban people who do that from festivals... it's simple really, advertising is the only thing in which fake or bogus stuff gets recognized and nothing happens... what bothers me is the insult on the 99% of all people who work their ass off to produce good work, and DO manage to win awards and influence the market, having our line of work tarnished over award hunger frenzy of agency networks, such as Saatchi, BBDO, etc...

Getting accounts such as these is such tough work... months of proposals, planning, late hours, I feel so bad for the agency team, who are the guys and gals who put in the long hours and deal with everyday stuff, who unfairly get their name tarnished by some hot shot CD who just hops from award show to award show, doing crap like this in their own little word of fake geniuses and peer pressure to get the gold.

Or in this case, bronze... cheers!

Email a friend